More Service, More Options, More Results

Introduce

Navigating the often turbulent waters of family law can be one of the most challenging experiences a Texan family can face. From child custody disputes to visitation rights, the decisions made in family court have profound and lasting impacts on parents and children alike. For those in San Antonio and across Texas, understanding the judicial process and how court proceedings can shape your family's future is paramount. This overview aims to shed light on some of the realities of family court, drawing on feedback from local experiences, to help Texans better prepare for and understand these sensitive legal journeys.

Family courts are designed to resolve disputes related to domestic relations, with a primary focus on the best interests of the child. However, the path to resolution can often feel like a "nightmare" to those involved. Parents seeking to establish or enforce existing court orders, particularly concerning child visitation, often encounter a complex system where outcomes can be unpredictable. It is crucial for families to be aware of the nuances of judicial proceedings and to advocate vigorously for their rights and the well-being of their children. While the judicial system strives for fairness, individual cases can sometimes lead to rulings that are perceived as "unfair" or "unrealistic," especially when dealing with the emotional weight of parental rights and children's involvement in court.

Location and Accessibility

While the provided address of 600 Mission Rd, San Antonio, TX 78210, USA, indicates a location within San Antonio, it's important to clarify the context of this information. Based on public records, Lisa K. Jarrett is primarily known as a former judge of the 436th District Court in Bexar County, Texas, not as an attorney in private practice at this specific address. The 436th District Court is a juvenile court within the Bexar County judicial system.

Bexar County courthouses, where judicial proceedings take place, are centrally located in downtown San Antonio, making them generally accessible to residents across the city and surrounding areas of Texas. Accessibility typically includes public transportation options and parking facilities, though parking in downtown areas can sometimes be challenging. For individuals involved in court proceedings, the location of the courthouse is determined by the specific court assigned to their case. Given that family courts handle sensitive matters, being aware of the court's location and accessibility is important for all parties involved in legal proceedings in San Antonio.

Services Offered (Judicial Context)

In the context of a judge presiding over a district court, the "services offered" are not legal representation to clients, but rather the administration of justice and the rendering of decisions in legal cases. Specifically, for a judge in a district court that handles family law and juvenile matters, the roles and responsibilities include:

  • Presiding Over Trials and Hearings: Managing court proceedings, hearing arguments from attorneys, and reviewing evidence presented by both sides in cases such as divorce, child custody, child support, and juvenile offenses.
  • Issuing Rulings and Orders: Making judicial decisions based on presented facts and legal statutes, which culminate in court orders. These orders are legally binding and dictate outcomes regarding parental rights, visitation schedules, child support payments, and dispositions in juvenile cases.
  • Interpreting and Applying Law: Ensuring that legal statutes, precedents, and procedures are correctly applied to the facts of each case.
  • Facilitating Dispute Resolution: While not directly mediating, judges often encourage and oversee various forms of alternative dispute resolution, such as mediation, to help parties reach amicable agreements outside of a full trial.
  • Protecting Rights: Ensuring that the rights of all parties involved, including parents and minor children, are protected during court proceedings, in accordance with state and federal laws (e.g., Child Bill of Rights).
  • Managing Court Dockets: Overseeing the schedule of cases, ensuring efficient movement through the judicial system.

The core function is to be an impartial arbiter, weighing evidence and arguments to arrive at a just and fair decision, even when those decisions are met with strong reactions from involved parties.

Features / Highlights (Judicial Context)

When discussing a judge, "features and highlights" pertain to their professional background, judicial philosophy, and public perception based on their rulings and conduct. Based on the provided reviews and general public information about a judge:

  • Judicial Experience: Lisa K. Jarrett has served as a judge of the 436th District Court, a juvenile court, for a significant period (from 2009 until December 31, 2022, as per Ballotpedia). Prior to her judgeship, she had experience as a prosecutor and in private practice handling criminal cases, including juvenile matters.
  • Board Certification: She is Board Certified in Juvenile Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, indicating a high level of specialized knowledge and expertise in this specific area.
  • Commitment to Community and Justice: Her official judicial website states a commitment to the community and dedication to justice, particularly highlighting the importance of rehabilitating juveniles while also protecting the community.
  • Public Scrutiny: As a judge, her decisions are subject to public and litigant scrutiny. The provided reviews reflect a strong negative reaction from a party to a family law case, perceiving the ruling as unfair and leading to alienation. This highlights the inherent difficulty and emotional intensity of family court cases, where judicial decisions, even when made with legal basis, can have devastating impacts on personal lives and be viewed very differently by those affected.
  • Emphasis on Child's Best Interest: In family law, judges are legally bound to make decisions based on the "best interest of the child." What constitutes this can be complex and is often hotly debated by parents and legal teams.

It is important to understand that judges operate under specific legal frameworks and make decisions based on the evidence presented in court, which may not always align with the desires or perceptions of all parties involved.

Promotions or Special Offers

As a judge, Lisa K. Jarrett does not offer "promotions" or "special offers" in the commercial sense. Judges are impartial arbiters of the law and do not market their services. Their role is to apply the law fairly to all cases brought before their court. Any information related to a judge would pertain to their judicial record, legal philosophy, or public service, rather than promotional incentives. Individuals seeking legal assistance in family court would typically engage an attorney who would then represent them before the presiding judge.

Contact Information (Judicial Context)

Contact information for a judge or a judicial office is typically for official court business or administrative inquiries, not for seeking legal advice or personal consultations on cases. The address provided, 600 Mission Rd, San Antonio, TX 78210, USA, appears to be a residential address or a location not formally listed as a current public judicial office or law firm for Lisa K. Jarrett.

For matters related to the 436th District Court or other Bexar County family courts, the official contact information would be through the Bexar County Clerk's office or the specific court's administration, usually located in downtown San Antonio. Individuals needing to contact a judge's office for official court purposes should consult the Bexar County government website or court directories for the correct and publicly listed contact details. The provided phone numbers (210) 335-1194 and +1 210-335-1194 are not consistent with publicly available contact details for her as a former judge of the 436th District Court, which lists a PO Box and a different phone number for campaign purposes. Therefore, this information should not be used for official court communication.

Conclusion: Why this place is suitable for locals

When considering "suitability for locals" in the context of a judicial figure like Lisa K. Jarrett, it's not about choosing a service provider, but rather understanding the role and impact of the judiciary on the local community, particularly in sensitive areas like family law. For Texans in San Antonio, navigating family court proceedings means interacting with judges who make life-altering decisions regarding children, parental rights, and financial futures.

The experience of individuals in family court is highly personal and can vary significantly. While the legal system aims for fairness and justice, the inherent complexities and emotional intensity of family disputes mean that judicial rulings, regardless of their legal basis, can be met with strong emotional responses from those directly affected. The provided reviews, though extremely critical and deeply personal, underscore the profound impact that a judge's decisions have on families, particularly concerning issues like parental visitation and perceived accountability for order violations.

For locals, the existence of dedicated juvenile and family courts, and judges who are Board Certified in specific areas like Juvenile Law, signifies a system designed to address these specialized and critical issues. While individual rulings may be controversial or lead to dissatisfaction, the judicial system strives to uphold legal principles and the best interests of minors within the bounds of the evidence presented. Texans involved in family law matters should always seek competent legal counsel to effectively present their case and navigate the complexities of judicial proceedings, ensuring their voices are heard and their rights are protected within the framework of the court system.

Location & Map

600 Mission Rd, San Antonio, TX 78210, USA

Customer Reviews

(3 reviews)

R
Raquel Washington
May 28, 2024

This is by far the worst judge who should not have a license to even practice. She denied a father his rights when he was simply trying to be involved in his child's life. The father went to court to enforce an order that was already established. The mother had been consistently denying the father visitation. Seeing Judge Jarrett was the 4th time this mother had violated the order. Instead of holding the mom accountable, she took the father's rights away by limiting him to daily phone calls. He had to ask if he could at least be provided supervised visits to see his child. Judge Jarrett was unfair in her ruling and decision. Family court is already a nightmare. Judges like her should not practice. The minor was in the court proceedings for half of the argument. No minor child should be in courts during parental proceedings. The father stated child bill of rights to encourage the judge to ask that the minor step out which went on deaf ears. Horrible horrible person. Insensitivity to the realities of family court. I pray you never preside over any family law matters. If she does I pray and hope she can be fair and just. She aiding in this dad being further alienated from his child with her unrealistic ruling. The father is a honorable discharged vet whom works as a Healthcare Administrator with no criminal history or just cause to be limited to phone calls and supervised visits.

R
Raquel Washington
May 28, 2024

This is by far the worst judge who should not have a license to even practice. She denied a father his rights when he was simply trying to be involved in his child's life. The father went to court to enforce an order that was already established. The mother had been consistently denying the father visitation. Seeing Judge Jarrett was the 4th time this mother had violated the order. Instead of holding the mom accountable, she took the father's rights away by limiting him to daily phone calls. He had to ask if he could at least be provided supervised visits to see his child. Judge Jarrett was unfair in her ruling and decision. Family court is already a nightmare. Judges like her should not practice. The minor was in the court proceedings for half of the argument. No minor child should be in courts during parental proceedings. The father stated child bill of rights to encourage the judge to ask that the minor step out which went on deaf ears. Horrible horrible person. Insensitivity to the realities of family court. I pray you never preside over any family law matters. If she does I pray and hope she can be fair and just. She aiding in this dad being further alienated from his child with her unrealistic ruling. The father is a honorable discharged vet whom works as a Healthcare Administrator with no criminal history or just cause to be limited to phone calls and supervised visits.

D
D. Majeski
Mar 31, 2023

Judge Jarrett represented me when she was an attorney in a difficult matter of tragedy well over a decade ago - and I am still very grateful to her - for her professionalism, her caring in the situation, and her quality representation.

D
D. Majeski
Mar 31, 2023

Judge Jarrett represented me when she was an attorney in a difficult matter of tragedy well over a decade ago - and I am still very grateful to her - for her professionalism, her caring in the situation, and her quality representation.

R
Rosenda Vasquez
Sep 01, 2019

. me

R
Rosenda Vasquez
Sep 01, 2019

. me

More Laywer Nearby